How to un-Google yourself & push bad news off Page 1

Mark MaciasThis month’s guest blog post is from Mark Macias, a crisis communications consultant. He runs a TV production and PR company that has consulted with restaurants, retailers, lounges and Congressional candidates. He also wrote the communications book, Beat the Press: Your Guide to Managing the Media.  You can read excerpts at BeatthePressBook.com

By Mark  Macias
Guest Blogger

Everyone likes to secretly Google himself, but what happens when Google turns up results you don’t like? How do you get your name removed from the search engines when the material is damaging?

Alan Gottlob, an established New Jersey financial consultant, woke up one morning to discover his reputable name was falsely accused of ethical violations. Making it worse, the writer never called Gottlob for a response. Gottlob first learned of the article three months after it was published, when a client read it on the Internet and asked him about it.
  
These strong allegations can destroy nearly any person’s business, but in an industry built on trust – like the financial industry – the article nearly destroyed Gottlob’s private practice.
Gottlob reached out to me to manage his crisis communications after he didn’t get anywhere with the web publisher, Investment News. We applied several new strategies and within weeks, Investment News and its parent company, Crain Communications Inc., were in discussions to correct the article.
  
If you find yourself in this situation, there are several steps you can take to get the material removed from the Internet. Contrary to the popular saying, “the Internet is written in ink,” it is possible to modify the record if you apply some proven crisis communications strategies.
  
Here are some of the strategies you can take if you find yourself in a similar crisis situation as Gottlob.
  
1)    Go after the power brokers or the people who finance the publication, which includes the publisher, city editors, Executive Producers, and most important: the legal counsel for the publication. Do a quick Google search to find out who owns the website or publication. Most people, like Gottlob, contact the writer when a negative article is published, but that’s like complaining to the sales clerk when the cashier gives you the wrong change. You need to complain to the people who control the money.
  
Your letter to these power brokers needs to state why this article is inaccurate and most important, how the article has financially harmed your business. If you can’t show any financial duress from the article, you won’t succeed in the court of law or with the publisher.
  
2)    Understand the difference between libelous, slander and opinion. If a blogger writes that you smell, you can’t take legal action to bring down the story. However, if the blogger writes a factually inaccurate article that accuses you of wrongdoing and harms your business. And you don’t always need an attorney for this. Sometimes a strongly worded letter that outlines the bullet points from above is enough to get the publisher’s attention.
  
3)    Don’t wait. Go after the website’s owners immediately. The longer the website is up, the more time search engines have to index the web page. Unfortunately, it took Gottlob several weeks to get ahold of the reporter and her superiors, which is sometimes the secret strategy many journalists take to diffuse the threat from any lawsuits.
  
4)  Google will stop indexing the website if you can prove the website displays private personal information like Social Security numbers. However, you need to make a case to them if it involves other matters. You can find this page on Google here.
  
5)  Push the article off the first Google page with new content. There is another strategy you can take to bury the article off of the first page from Google. You can accomplish this by writing your own blog or material and making sure it is indexed with the proper search engine optimization.
  
6) Once the page is removed, you need to write a letter to all the search engines to make sure the page is no longer indexed.
  
This form of crisis communications will only grow in the future as more bloggers and news organizations post articles on the Internet. If the article is false and inaccurate, don’t be afraid to fight back. Just make sure you’re not picking a fight over someone’s opinion because, luckily, the First Amendment still protects us from that.
*    *    *

Should BP pressure Twitter to remove the fake feed?

Here’s a tweet posted yesterday from the Twitter account known as @BPGlobalPR:

Fake Twitter post about BP oil spill


That’s just one of a steady stream of sarcastic tweets that, as of this morning, has attracted more than 96,000 followers, almost 10 times more followers than BP has at its own Twitter account.

CNET News offers  a good summary of who might be behind the fake account, and what has happened since it was created.

It’s just one more episode in the PR nightmare tied to the Gulf Oil spill.

What I find most bizarre about the fake account, which was created on May 19, is that Twitter hasn’t removed it. BP spokesman Tony Odone told AdAge.com:

“I’m not aware of whether BP has made any calls to have it taken down or addressed. People are entitled to their views on what we’re doing, and we have to live with those…People are frustrated at what’s happening, as are we, and that’s just their way of expressing it.”

My heart aches for the people and wildlife affected by the oil spill, and I don’t see anything funny about the sarcasm. BP has bigger PR problems than Twitter. But if I were counseling BP, I’d encourage them to contact Twitter immediately and ask them to either remove the account, or at least include a disclaimer. Here’s why:

  • The fake feed is stealing BP’s brand.
  • BP has proven it has little control over anything, including figuring out a way to stop the gushing oil. At the very least, it should try to minimize the damage however it can.
  • The fake account I mentioned here has prompted several other imposters to create their own fake BP Twitter accounts.  That means trouble multiplied.

Am I wrong?

PR and crisis communications experts, how would you counsel BP? Should the company distance itself from information like this that further tarnishes its already-battered brand? What should Twitter do about fake accounts like this one? Should it treat them all the same?

What about BP’s CEO who told a news reporter yesterday “I want my life back”?

Update on June 9:

BP finally asks Twitter to make BPGLobalPR to post a disclaimer, and Twitter finally gets off the dime. The disclaimer reads: “We are not associated with Beyond petroleum, the company that has been destroying the Gulf of Mexico for 51 days.”

What took so long?

Top 10 ways to get free publicity from the Tiger Woods mess

megaphone2Piggybacking onto hot celebrity gossip ranks right up there as one of the best ways to generate free publicity for your product, service, cause or issue.

But hurry. This story may be old news by the end of the week.

Here are the Top 10 ways to create free publicity for yourself by participating in the Tiger Woods conversation online and offline:



  1. If you’re an expert in a topic that ties into this drama, pitch influential bloggers who are writing about the story. Explain your area of expertise and offer commentary.
        
  2. Post comments at high-traffic blogs like Huffington Post that are discussing the story. Ditto at blogs written by journalists, like sports columnist Jason Whitlock whose post on Tiger’s Real Crime? Not Playing the Media’s Game attracted more than 500 comments in about two hours this morning. Weave into your comment information about your expertise. If appropriate, lead people back to your website where they can find tips, advice or a quiz that ties into the topic.
         
  3. If you’re a divorce attorney who can talk about prenups, an ad agency executive who’s an expert on branding or celebrity endorsements, a crisis counselor or PR pro who can discuss PR 101, and even a minister who can offer tips on how to forgive, write a letter to the editor of local, regional and national publications where the stories are appearing.
          
  4. Call your local TV stations and offer yourself as the local angle to this international story. Offer a list of short tips.
          
  5. Create a short two-minute video offering advice on what others can learn from Tiger’s mess and upload it to YouTube and the other video-sharing sites. Tag it with keywords that people are using to search for information on the story.
          
  6. Subscribe to free media leads services like HARO and PitchRate, or paid services like ProfNet and PRLeads, so you know about the types of sources journalists are seeking for their stories.
            
  7. Offer to write a guest blog post about it, with tips and advice. BloggerLinkUp helps guest bloggers and bloggers who need guest posts find each other. 
        
  8. Pitch clever angles to this story to drive-time radio show hosts. Example: A cell phone expert can pitch a story on “Got a dirty little secret? 5 ways to cover your tracks on your cell phone.”         

  9. Write your own blog post that ties into Tiger Woods, include lots of outbound links, and then bookmark it at sites like Digg and Delicious. The “Top 10 Tips…” headline works well. I got the idea for this post while reading Tip #3 in Bryan Eisenbertg’s blog post on Top 3 Problems of Social Media.
            
  10.  Do all of the above, and link to them from Twitter and Facebook.

If you’ve piggybacked off the Tiger Woods is story to generate free publicity for yourself or clients, or you’d like to add to this list, join the conversation.    



Help artist raise funds for legal defense; win a shovel mask

firebowl2John T. Unger of Mancelona, MI writes:

“My fire bowls, original art which I’ve been making since 2005, have been copied by a manufacturer.  He is now suing me in federal court to overturn my existing copyrights and continue making knockoffs. 

“I have a strong case, a great lawyer and believe that if I can continue to defend myself, the case will be resolved in my favor. You can read more about it at my blog.

“I did not initiate this lawsuit, but am defending my art, my creative rights, my reputation and my livelihood.  I’ve already spent over $50,000 out of pocket in defense of my original designs.  Seeking a judicial ruling in federal court will cost more than most artists or small businesses can afford, but attempts at settlement have been unsuccessful.  I am holding a fundraising sale of my artwork to finance a defense in court.

John-T-Unger-w02“What ideas do your Hounds have for using traditional and social media to raise awareness of the story, its broader implications for other creative professionals and raising funds to see that the laws which protect copyright are not weakened for other artists?”




        
The Publicity Hound says:

shovel maskWhen John called me to ask for my advice on this, I suggested we use it as a Help This Hound question. He offered to send me a beautiful shovel mask ($59), artwork made from a recycled shovel, to thank me. I suggested we use it instead as a reward for the Hound who comes up with the best idea for his publicity campaign.       

Explain your idea in the comments section below. We’ll take ideas for two weeks, and I’ll announce the winner of the mask in my newsletter on Tuesday, Nov. 10.  Tweet this, and  share it with your Facebook friends. 


Media interview? How to deal with a confused journalist

confused man with raised eyebrows2You’re being interviewed by a magazine reporter who clearly doesn’t understand the topic, despite your best efforts to explain it over and over again.

What do you do?

That’s what a graduate of The Publicity Hound Mentor Program asked me just now.

“A staffer recently did repeated interviews with a magazine writer, and sent follow-up emails for clarification, but the information still came out wrong in the article. What’s the best wording to use these days when you want to see what the reporter has drafted before it goes out? I realize that most reporters will at least read you back your quotes.”

Here’s what I told her:

When you’re being interviewed either by phone or in person, and you can tell that the reporter is becoming more and more confused, ask, ”I want to make sure I’m explaining this clearly enough and not confusing you.  Can you explain to me your understanding of this topic?”

If the reporter can’t explain it, he’s confused. If he insists on writing the article anyway, ask him to call you before the article appears to “fact check” it. Many reporters don’t know what a “fact check” entails because they work for publications that don’t routinely do fact-checking.

Big magazines check facts, however. A fact checker, who usually is not the same person who wrote the article, calls you, reads the facts to you, and verifies that they are accurate. If a fact is wrong, you can correct the record before the story appears. Sometimes a fact-check includes your direct quotes.


When the reporter won’t cooperate

If a reporter will not agree to do a fact check, don’t be afraid to take the next step. Call the reporter’s boss and explain that you’re convinced the reporter is confused. And then ask, “What can we do so that you get your story and your readers get accurate information? I don’t want your readers to be confused. I also don’t want to be misquoted. And I’m sure you don’t want to be in the embarrassing position of having to run a correction because your reporter printed something that was inaccurate.”

That should solve the problem. The editor might kill the story. Or she might quiz the reporter herself. Or she might make sure SHE’S the one who edits the story and is convinced the reporter understands what he’s writing.

If the topic isn’t confusing and you’re confident the reporter understands it well enough, you can still ask the reporter for a fact-check and to call you and read back to you only information that will be put into quotation marks.

When I worked as a reporter and sources asked me to do this, I almost always agreed. But I made it clear that if they decided that they didn’t like the way their quotes sounded, they didn’t have the right to change them. I would reword a quote only if I didn’t write it down accurately.


More ways to help reporters

You can also help a reporter better understand a complicated issue by supplying supporting data such as reports or other media articles, or blog posts you’ve written. You can offer statistics such as pie charts, bar charts and graphics. You can provide links to other online resources that clearly explain the issue.

Read my other tips on how to ensure accuracy during media interviews and how to ask a journalist for a correction.


Record the interview

When I interviewed crisis counselor Jonathan Bernstein on how to keep the media wolves at bay, he mentioned that if the topic of an interview is sensitive, you can always tell the journalist you want to record it. If the journalist knows you have a recording,  they’ll go the extra mile to make sure they quote you accurately.

And, yes, they get to record it, too. That’s only fair.  Check the laws governning recording phone conversations in your own state or country.